Psychosis: “Lead Us Not Into Temptation”

Nazi_propaganda

I have been thinking about the word “temptation” and exploring its definition.

Temptation’s root is the word “tempo”.  It is any repeating pattern that destroys our individuality and turns us into the mindless mob.  Whether it is “Zeig Heil” or “Yes We Can” or any religious repetition destroys the cycles of mental individuality and synchronizes us into a martial tempo.  It is collective psychosis, a mental virus, sensory cycling, the swastika.  In fact, martial, chanting and temptation are synonymous.  The Nazi Flag is the image of a revolutionary global white psychosis.

The challenge is not to think the same or to think different.  The challenge is to have the strength to think for yourself.  Your evolving personal melody not a static collective march.  That is the true formula for happiness and peace.  Anarchy and Libertarianism are good.  The leaders, drum beaters, of the herds fear it.

Advertisements

Cooperation Studies: A New Story

rheingold_howard-small.jpg

howardrheingoldlogo.gif

Howard Rheingold, introduces a new story regarding how human systems are acting collectively. Cooperation has created entirely new systems with new motives, organization, processes, inventory, geography and tempos. And new technology is becoming a ever more powerful catalyst for cooperation as we are experiencing in smart mobs and wikinomics.

Here’s Howard’s own video on Blip.tv

Here’s Howard’s presentation at the TED 2005 Conference

Thinking the Hexads Through

Working with the hexads and the Six Hats, Six Coats model has raised some interesting conceptual questions. This post is an incomplete attempt to address them.

 

grouppersonal.jpg

We have many personas within each of us. This is evidenced by our ExtraPersonal behaviour. Depending on the environment we interact within we present different behavior. ExtraPersonal thought manages our personas. This meets our safety need.
To satisfy our physiological needs our InterPersonal behavior is exhibited. Our personas communicate with each other. This is true internal dialog.

To engage with other systems we depend on IntraPersonal behavior. These are the sensory-motor functions as guided by a single persona.

I’m trying to think about how this hexad affects the Moffett Universe of Discourse.

Here’s the Universe before:

jamesmoffett.jpg

moffetttetrad.jpg

Here’s the Universe after:

moffetthexad02.jpg

I’m working on developing a data model to represent this new hexad structure as well:

hexaddatamodel02.jpg

I have been working on creating a new vocabulary to describe the associations in the hexads. I apologize for any terms I have had to invent, but a new concept requires new terms. The first three terms (ie. ExtraNetwork, InterNetwork, IntraNetwork) are external to the entity. The second three terms (ie. ExtraSpatia, InterSpatia, IntraSpatia) are internal to the entity.

MOTIVE
ExtraStrategy
InterStrategy
IntraStrategy
ExtraMotiva
InterMotiva
IntraMotiva

LOCALE
ExtraNetwork
InterNetwork
IntraNetwork
ExtraSpatia
InterSpatia
IntraSpatia

OBJECT
ExtraAssembly
InterAssembly
IntraAssembly
ExtraForma
InterForma
IntraForma

METHOD
ExtraProcess
InterProcess
IntraProcess
ExtraFunctiona
InterFunctiona
IntraFunctiona

PERSON
ExtraGroup
InterGroup
IntraGroup
ExtraPersona
InterPersona
IntraPersona

MOMENT
ExtraSequence
InterSequence
IntraSequence
ExtraTempora
InterTempora
IntraTempora

The gist of all these terms is that there are systems and associations without us and within us. For every level of granularity we establish there are levels of granularity above and below what is essentially an arbitrary “zero point”.

ringpersongroup.jpg

My thoughts on the hexad structure are gradually establishing themselves. There are still some incongruities that I am attempting to work out. One of them is individual and group phenomenology.  Another is how to represent the relationships above and below the person-group horizon in the person focus as well as with the other focuses.