When – Where
How – What
How Much – Why
This is the set of equations I find curious. As you can see (C)/(C) equals Energy. Consequently, what are the two higher forms that correlate with Gravity?
The key is the universe is composed of particles of a broad variety. But every particle is simply an association in the form of a set. The lowest order particles are event and point. They are one dimensional particles. All subsequent higher dimension particles can be reduced to a subset of these particles.
The three axes of the octahedron are the universes of different orders. They are simply subsets of one another.
The six vertexes of the octahedron are the vertex dimension sets of the system.
The twelve edges of the octahedron are edge dimension sets between each of the vertex dimension sets. These edge sets are also particles and the same set equations can be applied to them that were applied to the vertex sets.
To understand the tables you will require high school level physics knowledge and an understanding of basic set theory.
First, I am taking ordinal sets and performing three set operations on them to get subsets.
Second, I am then plugging the subsets into a standard set equation that describes the “space” for that dimension set.
Third, I am then introducing the result into a higher order dimension set.
I have been giving theoretical physics a thorough and systematic going over and I think I’ve come up with a unified solution that incorporates gravity and all the particles.
I’m thankful for the work of:
Giants whose shoulders I stand on.
Each row in this model is a set of particles. Everything is ultimately composed of distance and time.
I am creating a new taxonomy because the existing names do not consistently define the particles of the system.
The structure of the schema is three dimensional and composed of three shells:
Inner Tetrahedral Intrashell:
Middle Octahedral Intershell:
Outer Icosahedral Boundary Shell:
The edges, vertexes and connections between the shells are all significant in revealing the dependecy of the particles upon one another.
This is the best I can do for a two dimensional representation:
When R. Buckminster Fuller attempted to find the smallest solids that could fill space he made an interesting discovery. He rejected cubes as unstable and found that not one solid, but two were required: the tetrahedron and the octahedron. The product of his work was the octet truss which he patented.
When we look at classical and quantum physics we deal with not one but two versions of reality. The unobserved reality and the observed reality. Unobserved reality is a tetrahedron composed of four unities:
Observed reality is an octahedron composed of six unities:
Each unity is composed of three dimensions. Therefore, the unobserved universe is twelve dimensional and the observed universe is eighteen dimensional. At least, that is my hypothesis. The unobserved and observed universe join like the equilateral faces of a tetrahedron and an octahedron to create the universe as it behaves in an infinite matrix of octet space.